Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library
News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library

User account menu

Sign in Get Started
x

You're signed out

Sign in to access subscriber actions.

Pilot’s attempt to avoid liability for training expenses was grounded

December 2023 employment law letter
Authors: 

Jodi R. Bohr, Tiffany & Bosco, P.A.

The Arizona Employment Protection Act (AEPA) sets two standards under which a constructive discharge claim (i.e., a claim by an employee who resigned due to working conditions) may be established. The first requires an employee to provide the employer with 15 days’ written notice of the objectively difficult or unpleasant working conditions that is making the employee feel compelled to resign. Employers must post a notice advising employees of their rights to be protected by the safe harbor provided by the AEPA.

The second standard requires an employee to establish outrageous conduct by the employer, including threats of violence or a continuous pattern of discriminatory harassment, thereby avoiding the notice requirement. Can an employee circumvent this notice requirement by filing a common law (rather than AEPA) claim against his employer regarding his alleged forced resignation?

Continue reading your article with a HRLaws membership
  • Sign in
  • Sign up
Upgrade to a subscription now
to get unlimited access to everything on HR Laws.
Start subscription
Any time

Publications

  • Employment Law Letter
  • Employers State Law Alert
  • Federal Employment Law Insider

Your Library Reading List

Reading list 6
Creating List 7
Testing

Let's manage your states

We'll keep you updated on state changes

Manage States
© 2025
BLR®, A DIVISION OF SIMPLIFY COMPLIANCE LLC | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Footer - Copyright

  • terms
  • legal
  • privacy