Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library
News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library

User account menu

Sign in Get Started
x

You're signed out

Sign in to access subscriber actions.

Pandemic didn’t take away right to discharge an employee who violates policy

March 2024 employment law letter
Authors: 

Kaitlin L.H. Robidoux, Steptoe & Johnson PLLC

In an unpublished opinion issued January 31, 2024, the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals (whose rulings apply to all employers in North Carolina, South Carolina, and West Virginia) dismissed a case without a trial in favor of an employer on disability-based discrimination and retaliation claims. The court reaffirmed previous findings by the U.S. Supreme Court and the 4th Circuit that four months between a protected act and a discharge decision isn’t sufficient to prove it was motivated by the protected act.

Here, that was true even though the employer never responded to the accommodation request an immunocompromised employee made during the COVID-19 pandemic. The court’s reasoning also reaffirms that evidence an employee violated company policy defeats a discrimination and retaliation claim even when the employee alleges she violated the policy out of a sense of responsibility for others’ health during a pandemic.

Facts

Continue reading your article with a HRLaws membership
  • Sign in
  • Sign up
Upgrade to a subscription now
to get unlimited access to everything on HR Laws.
Start subscription
Any time

Publications

  • Employment Law Letter
  • Employers State Law Alert
  • Federal Employment Law Insider

Your Library Reading List

Reading list 6
Creating List 7
Testing

Let's manage your states

We'll keep you updated on state changes

Manage States
© 2025
BLR®, A DIVISION OF SIMPLIFY COMPLIANCE LLC | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Footer - Copyright

  • terms
  • legal
  • privacy