Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library
News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library

User account menu

Sign in Get Started
x

You're signed out

Sign in to access subscriber actions.

Lawyers behaving badly: The Texas Supreme Court chimes in

June 2024 employment law letter
Authors: 

Michael P. Maslanka, UNT-Dallas College of Law

Recently, the Texas Supreme Court set aside a verdict against an employer when the plaintiffs’ lawyer made appeals to racial prejudice and gender bias during the trial.

Car crash

An employee of New Prime Inc. rear-ended Christine John, a black woman, and Christopher Lewis, a black man. New Prime conceded negligence, and the court held a trial solely on damages. That’s when the bad behavior started.

The plaintiffs’ lawyer commented, “There are studies where women are awarded for the same injuries less than men.” Later in jury selection, the lawyer reiterated that “there are studies that show a woman --- her damages are less than man for the same injuries, and sometimes it’s like a woman --- her damages are actually less than a man for the same injuries, and sometimes it’s like if someone is --- does it matter if my client is African-American?”

So far, these are odd comments but nothing improper. But, as Sherlock Holmes would say, “The game is afoot, Watson!”

Continue reading your article with a HRLaws membership
  • Sign in
  • Sign up
Upgrade to a subscription now
to get unlimited access to everything on HR Laws.
Start subscription
Any time

Publications

  • Employment Law Letter
  • Employers State Law Alert
  • Federal Employment Law Insider

Your Library Reading List

Reading list 6
Creating List 7
Testing

Let's manage your states

We'll keep you updated on state changes

Manage States
© 2025
BLR®, A DIVISION OF SIMPLIFY COMPLIANCE LLC | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Footer - Copyright

  • terms
  • legal
  • privacy