Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library
News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library

User account menu

Sign in Get Started
x

You're signed out

Sign in to access subscriber actions.

Employers not at fault when employees transmit COVID-19 to nonemployees

July 2023 employment law letter
Authors: 
Brandon Rainey, Duane Morris LLP

On July 6, 2023, the California Supreme Court issued its ruling that employers aren’t legally responsible in preventing the spread of COVID-19 to nonemployee household members who contracted the virus as a result of exposure to an employee who, in turn, contracted the virus at work. This decision is undoubtedly good news for employers, who for years now have been operating under a concern of potential liability for injuries that they, to a large extent, cannot control. The court’s decision reflects a sensible policy position that tort (wrongful act) liability schemes are a poor mechanism for handling the fallout from a global pandemic. While the court’s employee-friendly bona fides are well established, this decision recognizes a commonsense liability boundary where the implications of recognizing a duty of care for tort purposes would do far more harm than good.

Continue reading your article with a HRLaws membership
  • Sign in
  • Sign up
Upgrade to a subscription now
to get unlimited access to everything on HR Laws.
Start subscription
Any time

Publications

  • Employment Law Letter
  • Employers State Law Alert
  • Federal Employment Law Insider

Your Library Reading List

Reading list 6
Creating List 7
Testing

Let's manage your states

We'll keep you updated on state changes

Manage States
© 2025
BLR®, A DIVISION OF SIMPLIFY COMPLIANCE LLC | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Footer - Copyright

  • terms
  • legal
  • privacy