Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library
News & Analysis Policies & Forms Your Library

User account menu

Sign in Get Started
x

You're signed out

Sign in to access subscriber actions.

Anti-SLAPP doesn’t protect defamation intended to settle theoretical litigation

June 2023 employment law letter
Authors: 
Ivan Muñoz, Duane Morris LLP

California’s Anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) statute is intended to curtail lawsuits brought primarily to chill the rights of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitutions in connection with speech of public concern. The Anti-SLAPP statute provides the employer the ability to have such claims dismissed before trial. In a recent decision, the California Court of Appeal clarified that not all prelitigation statements to former employees will constitute activity subject to California’s Anti-SLAPP law and subject to a motion to strike.

Continue reading your article with a HRLaws membership
  • Sign in
  • Sign up
Upgrade to a subscription now
to get unlimited access to everything on HR Laws.
Start subscription
Any time

Publications

  • Employment Law Letter
  • Employers State Law Alert
  • Federal Employment Law Insider

Your Library Reading List

Reading list 6
Creating List 7
Testing

Let's manage your states

We'll keep you updated on state changes

Manage States
© 2025
BLR®, A DIVISION OF SIMPLIFY COMPLIANCE LLC | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Footer - Copyright

  • terms
  • legal
  • privacy